Consultation Period: Proposed Amendments to Bylaws

The Executive Board of Digital Medievalist is currently reviewing our Bylaws to ensure they best serve our community and mission. As part of this process, we invite all members to participate in a consultation period to provide feedback and suggestions on our proposed revisions. As a subscriber to the dm-l, you are a member of Digital Medievalist.

The core of the bylaws remains largely unchanged, but we have refined the language for clarity and consistency, corrected typographical errors, and integrated our commitment to inclusivity and equality throughout the document.

Please review the amended bylaws, and submit your comments by email to DMedievalist@googlegroups.com. The current bylaws (approved on 21 April 2022) can be found on the DM website.

This is your opportunity to share your thoughts and help shape the governance of our organisation. The consultation period will run until 28 March 2025, closing at 23:59 Pacific Daylight Time. Your input is invaluable, and we look forward to your contributions.

Following the consultation period, the Executive Board will review the feedback, implement necessary changes, and present the new bylaws to the membership for a seven-day vote.

DM Executive Board

A copy of the amended bylaws for consultation is also presented below for your convenience.


Bylaws

1. Name and Purpose

  • The name of this organisation is ‘Digital Medievalist’ (hereafter abbreviated ‘DM’).
  • DM is an international community of practice supporting digital medieval studies, an interdisciplinary field that applies digital methods and technologies to the study of the Middle Ages, broadly understood.
  • DM’s mission is to promote innovation and interdisciplinary exchange in digital medieval studies through maintaining open-access resources and organising scholarly activities, as outlined in Section 5.
  • DM is committed to creating an inclusive and welcoming atmosphere, prioritising diversity, equity, and inclusion.
  • DM is a non-profit organisation.
  • DM comprises three entities: the Executive Board, the Postgraduate Committee, and Membership.

2. Executive Board

2.1. Organisation and Responsibilities

  • DM is governed by an elected Executive Board who holds responsibility for the oversight of the organisation’s mission and its strategic direction.
  • The Executive Board ideally consists of nine members, each ordinarily serving a four-year term.
  • Every year, the Executive Board elects a Director from its ranks and appoints committees and officers as necessary for its core activities as defined in Section 5. Ordinarily, the committees are responsible for: 
  • Managing the website.
  • Moderating the mailing list.
  • Moderating social media accounts.
  • Editing the journal.
  • Organising events.
  • Membership on these committees is not exclusive; individuals may serve multiple roles.
  • The Executive Board may delegate tasks to members at large but retains final responsibility.

2.2. Elections and Terms

  • Elections take place every two years for a four-year term (see Election Procedures, which provide guidance but are not part of these Bylaws). 
  • Terms of the members are staggered, with different numbers of positions open for election every two years.
  • Ties in elections are decided by the members of the Executive Board, excluding members standing for re-election.
  • Members may serve a maximum of two consecutive terms. After two terms, they must wait until the next ordinary election to qualify for re-election.
  • Members may resign at any time but should provide adequate notice. In such cases, the Executive Board may appoint a temporary member to fill the seat, decide to wait until the next ordinary election, or hold a special election.
  • In order to stand for election, candidates for the Executive Board must be members of DM and have made a demonstrable contribution to DM or the field in the recent past (for example, by presenting at a DM event or publishing in the DM Journal).

2.3. Director

  • The Executive Board elects a Director every year from among its members, ordinarily at the start of the first meeting of the year in August.
  • The duties of the Director include:
    • Convening and chairing the Executive Board meetings.
    • Serving as an ex officio member of all committees.
    • Delegating tasks as needed.
  • The Executive Board may elect the same Director to serve for a maximum of six years.
  • Decisions by the Director may be overturned by a two-thirds majority of the Executive Board.
  • A vote of no confidence requires a two-thirds majority of the Executive Board. A new Director will then be elected from the Executive Board members.

3. The Postgraduate Committee

  • The Postgraduate Committee (PGC) consists of and represents postgraduate and early career members of DM. 
  • PGC consists of ideally no fewer than three and no more than nine members serving no longer than five years.
  • Appointments to the PGC are coordinated by the PGC with the assistance of the Executive Board.
  • The PGC coordinates with the Executive Board to ensure that their activities align with DM’s mission and strategies. A representative of the PGC is invited to Executive Board meetings and a representative of the Executive Board is invited to PGC meetings. 
  • The PGC is governed by its own bylaws (see Bylaws of the Postgraduate Committee, which provide guidance but are not part of these Bylaws).

4. Membership

  • Membership in DM is open to anyone with an interest in its mission and goals.
  • Membership is ordinarily conferred by subscribing to the DM mailing list. In exceptional circumstances, however, such as when the mailing list is unavailable, the Executive Board may verify and maintain membership records through alternative channels.
  • Individual members have the right to vote in Executive Board elections and on any issues that the Executive Board chooses to poll the membership on.
  • Members who meet additional eligibility criteria may stand for election to the DM Executive Board (see Section 2.2. Elections and Terms).
  • A member’s subscription to the mailing list, and consequently their membership in DM, may be suspended or revoked by the Director or their delegate (subject to confirmation by the Executive Board) for inappropriate behaviour on the list. Inappropriate behaviour includes but is not limited to racist, sexist, and ableist comments and communicating false or misleading information. In such cases, the member will be notified in writing once the decision is confirmed. A suspended or expelled member may reapply for membership after the DM Executive Board’s review.

5. Activities

5.1 Website

  • DM maintains a website as its main contact point, serving to increase visibility and engagement with the broader community.
  • The website is moderated by the Executive Board.

5.2 Mailing List

  • DM provides a forum for discussion and communication on digital medieval studies, for example, through an online mailing list.
  • The mailing list is open to anyone interested in digital medieval studies and is ordinarily how the Executive Board manages DM Membership.

5.3 Social Media

  • DM maintains social media channels to engage with the broader community and share relevant updates on digital medieval studies. These platforms are used to promote events, discussions, and other initiatives.
  • The social media channels are moderated by the Executive Board to ensure that content aligns with DM’s mission and guidelines, fostering constructive dialogue and engagement.

5.4 Journal

  • DM publishes a peer-reviewed, open-access journal focused on digital medieval studies.
  • The journal is ordinarily managed by an Editorial Committee, which is led by an Editor-in-Chief.
  • The Editor-in-Chief is appointed by the Director for a three-year term, following approval by the Executive Board.
  • The Editor-in-Chief of the journal is ordinarily an elected member of the Executive Board, but in exceptional circumstances may be a member of the DM community at large. In the latter case, they become an ex officio member of the Executive Board and are expected to attend the Executive Board meetings on a regular basis.

5.5 Events

  • DM organises scholarly events, for example, conference sessions at large international conferences as well as dedicated DM events.
  • Ordinarily, the Executive Board coordinates these events. Members are also invited to contribute ideas and help shape the schedule of DM’s events, ensuring a diverse and inclusive range of activities

5.6 Other Activities

  • DM may undertake additional activities that align with its mission and strategy, such as maintaining digital repositories and other related initiatives.
  • Ordinarily, the Executive Board coordinates these efforts. Members are also invited to contribute ideas for new initiatives or activities that align with DM’s goals and mission.

6. Amendments

  • Amendments to these bylaws may be proposed by the Executive Board and require a simple majority of the Executive Board.
  • Proposed amendments must be posted publicly on the DM website and communicated to the DM Membership for a 10-day comment period. Following the comment period, the Executive Board will discuss feedback and incorporate agreed changes by simple majority vote.
  • The final amended bylaws will be presented to the membership for a seven-day vote, requiring a two-thirds majority to pass.

A welcome (and a farewell)

Dear Digital Medievalist Members

It has come the time for me to leave the Executive Board (having finished my third and last possible biannual term). For the last five years, after a first year as vice-director, I have tried my best to fill the big shoes of my predecessors as Board Director.

I have seen the community grow and become ever more engaged, both in the DistList and through social media, and, last year, I’ve introduced the student and early-career sub-committee as a means to foster collaboration with and involve in DM a number of talented scholars at the beginning of their careers, with all their energy and stimulating ideas.

I now leave the Direction of DM in the very capable hands of Lynn Ransom. Lynn is Curator of Programs at the Schoenberg Institute for Manuscripts Studies at the University of Pennsylvania Libraries and, since 2008, she has directed the Schoenberg Database for Manuscripts. Lynn joined DM in 2016 and has been an invaluable member of the Executive Board since the very beginning.

This year, we also say goodbye to a number of longstanding members of the Board: Franz Fischer, who will carry on his role as Editor-in-Chief of the Digital Medievalist Journal, Mike Kestemont, and Georg Vogeler.

It has been an exciting six-years, and I am looking forward to all the good work that the new board, under Lynn’s direction, will undoubtedly do.

Farewell to you all and good luck to Lynn and the new board.

Alberto Campagnolo

Digital Diplomatics 2020 Call for Posters

Digital Diplomatics 2020 will bring together selected leading and upcoming experts in the study of Digital Diplomatics and related fields, to facilitate a productive exchange on the state and the future of the field. The conference will include expert panels, lightning talks, and a poster session, which is currently open for submissions. We are soliciting posters on any subject related to the study of charters and computing, including:

Machine Learning for Digital Diplomatics
Linguistic Corpora for Digital Diplomatics
Digitally Mediated Archives for Diplomatics
The Future of Diplomatics

Rolling Deadline no later than 17 March 12:00 GMT.
More information at https://digdipl20.hypotheses.org/87

Introducing DM’s Student and Early-Career Sub-Committee

Dear Digital Medievalist Members

If you recall, a couple of years ago, we ran a community survey to better understand our constituency, and its interests and expectations. We have used the survey results to guide our decisions and better represent the DM community. A significant issue that was highlighted by the survey was a certain lack of participation by part of (post-)graduate students and early career researchers. 

We have decided to tackle the problem by instituting a new subcommittee of students and early career scholars to work in parallel to the Executive Board, aiming at engaging with their peers and help the board in its activities.  

We have invited 8 outstanding and enthusiastic candidates to be part of this first instalment of the subcommittee. I will work as a liaison between the two boards to guarantee active communication and collaboration between the two boards. 

If the experiment will be successful—and I am confident it will!—we would like to call on the community once more to update the bylaws and make the subcommittee an official branch of DM, with regular calls for nominations and elections, as it is for the Executive Board. 

Allow me, therefore, to introduce the members of the subcommittee (in alphabetical order):

Hannah Busch: PhD candidate studying the application of Artificial Intelligence for the study of medieval Latin palaeography, at Huygens ING, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences. 

Nathan Daniels: PhD candidate in History at Johns Hopkins University, studying Parisian guilds, urban space and topography, with related interests in digital editions of historical texts, linked open data, and mapping.

Selina Galka: currently finishing the Joint-Masters-Degree in German Medieval Philology and studying the MA “Digital Humanities” at the Karl-Franzens-University Graz. 

Tessa Gengnagel: PhD candidate at the University of Cologne, with a background in History and Latin Philology of the Middle Ages and an interest in digital scholarly editions of non-textual materials.

James Harr, III: PhD student focusing on medieval media studies, petitionary networks, and material semiotics in the Communication, Rhetoric, and Digital Media program at North Carolina State University.

Aylin Malcolm: PhD candidate studying medieval literature and science, including digital editions of scientific manuscripts, at the University of Pennsylvania.

Caitlin Postal: PhD student caught between medieval literature, material culture, temporality, and digitality at the University of Washington.

Daniela Schulz studied History and English in Cologne, with a focus on medieval history, and also received some training in what’s now commonly called “Digital Humanities”. She is writing a doctoral thesis focusing on the digital edition of an early medieval Roman law text.

Alberto Campagnolo

 

 

 

A New Tool for Digital Manuscript Facsimiles: Introducing the Manicule Web Application

Aylin Malcolm, DM Postgraduate Subcommittee

Much of my work in digital manuscript studies has been informed by a simple question: is this something I can show to my parents? I am the only person among my family and childhood friends to pursue graduate studies in the humanities, and when others take an interest in my work, I try to provide resources that do not depend on specialized knowledge or institutional subscriptions. This question can also be framed in broader terms for scholars interested in public engagement: how can we make our research accessible and engaging for nonspecialists? How can scholars working on the material culture of previous periods demonstrate the relevance of such studies now? And how can digital resources enable us to learn from communities outside the traditional bounds of academia?

I recently confronted these questions while examining a late-fifteenth-century astronomical anthology, written in German and Latin close to the city of Nuremberg, and now identified as Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Kislak Center for Special Collections, Rare Books and Manuscripts, LJS 445. This codex, which you can see in my video orientation below, is remarkable for its inclusion of material from three incunables, making it a clear example of the transmission of knowledge from print to manuscript.

For more videos like this one, see the Schoenberg Institute Youtube channel.

My own fascination with LJS 445 began when I opened it for the first time and saw a charming sketch of a man on the first page. Turning to the second folio, I was struck by its whimsical doodles of gardens and doors. What were these doing in a book dealing mostly with astronomical calculations and predictions about the Church?

birds.pngDetail of fol. 2r of LJS 445.

My non-medievalist mother knew the answer immediately. “They’re children’s drawings,” she observed, pointing out the uneven writing and repetition of common motifs, such as trees. And turning to the 1997 catalogue description by Regina Cermann, I found that she was right: this book can be traced to two of the sons of a Nuremberg patrician, Georg Veit (1573-1606) and Veit Engelhard (1581-1656) Holtzschuher. Veit Engelhard left numerous marks in it, including the year “1589” (fols. 95v, 192r, and 222v), suggesting that he inscribed this book when he was around eight years old. Thus began my efforts to find out more about the contents and uses of this book, from its faithful copies of print editions to its battered and often mutilated constellation images. Perhaps my favourite discovery occurred as I was reading German genealogical records, when I came across an engraving of Veit Engelhard as an adult.holzschuher-1.jpg

This digitized portrait of Holtzschuher is from the Herzog August Bibliothek Wolfenbüttel. It was also printed in Die Porträtsammlung der Herzog August Bibliothek Wolfenbüttel, vol. 11, ed. Peter Mortzfeld (Münich: K.G. Saur, 1989), no. A 100058, p. 266.

To make this remarkable manuscript more accessible to the public, I created a digital edition of it using Manicule, a web application built by Whitney Trettien and Liza Daly. Manicule, which is available on GitHub at https://github.com/wtrettien/manicule, allows scholars and students to create accessible, dynamic web editions of manuscripts and other rare books. It offers three modes of entry into a digitized text: a “Browse” function, whereby the viewer scrolls through pages of the facsimile alongside marginal notes written by the editor; a series of editor-curated “Tour Stops,” which provide commentaries on pages of particular note; and a “Structure” view, which draws on Dot Porter’s VisColl data model to depict the physical makeup of the manuscript, including missing, inserted, and conjoint leaves. Manicule can be downloaded and deployed on Mac OS systems using the instructions on the GitHub repository; Whitney is also available to provide advice and resolve issues.

The finished edition of LJS 445, available at aylinmalcolm.com/ljs445 under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, is a true collaboration. In writing the text and creating the digital resource, I have built on the labours of many other researchers, including Regina Cermann; Whitney Trettien and Liza Daly; Dot Porter, whose tools for generating a collation model and image list are also available on the VisColl GitHub repository; and an entire digitization team at the University of Pennsylvania, from photographers to data managers and programmers. The result is also an evolving resource that can be adapted and augmented as new information about this manuscript emerges. Please feel free to contact me at malcolma[at]sas.upenn.edu if you have suggestions or queries, and I hope that you’ll enjoy exploring this unique manuscript.